Comey Do-It-Yourself Fabricated Evidence Against Trump – NYT, Dems Run With It

There are two questions that immediately come to mind when learning of the “new evidence” from James Comey that President Trump supposedly attempted to influence him – the first being why would anyone believe a word this political hack and likely crook has to say and secondly, why would we trust an accounting of it in the New York Times to be anything other than a partisan, anti-Trump hit job? Of course the answer to both questions is “we shouldn’t.”

The New York Times is the same trusted “news” source that was busted for fabricating stories about the President and some of the women in his life, such as Rowanne Brewer Lane, a year ago to the day. If anything they’ve gotten less credible since that time.

They labeled a document written by Comey, supposedly his own notes of a February meeting with President Trump, as “evidence that the President has tried to directly influence the Justice Department and FBI investigation into links between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia.” It may be proof that at some point in time Comey chose to write something he claims to be a record of the conversation. It may be proof that he’s trying to fabricate evidence, but it’s nothing more than that.

The propagandist at the NYT says, “Mr. Comey wrote the memo detailing his conversation with the president immediately after the meeting, which took place the day after Mr. Flynn resigned, according to two people who read the memo.” So the memo hasn’t even been seen by the “reporter” at the NYT, and he’s describing what two other anonymous people claim they “saw” as if it is fact. How close to hearsay can one get and still call it reporting? Evidently they’re one in the same at the New York Times. Those of us who grew up in rural America, who have a familiarity with livestock and barns would call it something else.

The Times reporter claims that “an FBI agent’s contemporaneous notes are widely held up in court as credible evidence of conversations.” Not when there are extenuating circumstances that cast doubt on the credibility and objectivity of the agent. A personal conflict of interest or basic corruption, such as he exhibited while protecting the international money launderers at HSBC bank, along with co-conspirator Loretta Lynch would diminish his credibility to zero in a fair, impartial hearing.

That presumption of integrity doesn’t apply when the FBI Director appears to have been hired to act as an insulator to protect Hillary Clinton and Hussein Obama from the FBI and the very justice he is supposed to serve and enforce. He, like the NYT and the rest of the DC swamp, has no credibility.

According to the New York Times article, “Mr. Comey shared the existence of the memo with senior FBI officials and close associates. The New York Times has not viewed a copy of the memo, which is unclassified, actually stating that they based their report on the fact that “one of Mr. Comey’s associates read parts of the memo to a Times reporter.”

They further propagate the disinformation, stating, “That reading is said to have included, ‘I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go,’ Mr. Trump told Mr. Comey, according to the memo. ‘He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.’”

Basing damning accusations upon third-hand information is not reporting worthy even of the National Enquirer, whose journalistic standards are clearly much higher than those exhibited by the NYT.

The hired obstructionist, Comey, who has failed to provide any information requested by the Intelligence Committees investigating the Russia Hoax that he’s been engineering, portrays himself as that bastion of integrity, who was willing only to respond, “I agree he is a good guy.”

The White House has denied ever asking Comey or anyone else to end any investigation involving General Flynn. They stated [according to the New York Times] “The president has the utmost respect for our law enforcement agencies, and all investigations. This is not a truthful or accurate portrayal of the conversation between the president and Mr. Comey.”

Put into plain English, Comey is continuing his efforts to take down President Trump from outside of the government, acting in concert with those who are still in power in the media and deep state. He’s the same snake he’s always been.

Thank you for reading and sharing

Source: Rick Wells